‘ yet he is aware that everything is in a state of flux. a strong wind can change the shape of a cloud, a tumbling river the shape of a river bank, the process of changes in the earth’s crust, the shape of mountains. ‘ – the power of Ch’i
dear diary,
(10 Oct 2012)
do we want to win this battle or not?
sometimes it is important to find out what the city is, not so much of what it was, or what it should be, but perhaps the essence of what the city actually stands for. this thought drove me to explore the notion of the city.
project N_ ‘ now this is not the end. it is not even the beginning of the end. but it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning. ‘ – Sir Winston Churchill
i have spent 4 years learning from the institution, it provoked an intuition of what the term ‘vibrancy’, and it’s quasi-endless potential , stood for. it’s role, often too quick to be generalized , can play a crucial key towards what characterizes the ‘real city’ in the 21st century. in such contemporary times, the stark indifference of what ‘vibrancy’ mean to the spectators of cities can somehow evoke an extraordinary artificial form of memory, which helps to facilitate the process and function of the city.
this city has changed at an unbelievable speed, and there is almost no illustration of its gradual shift from center to periphery (and possibly beyond) it presents herself in a rather idiosyncratic way, where my initial landing model succeeded in showing some properties of the evolution of complex systems, and in particular, the difficulty of governing a design determined by multiple interacting elements. however though, what is evidently clear is that the complexity of systems does not allow us to keep thinking in linear causality or in simple systems (any longer).
for this investigation, i propose a radical model that challenges the conventional notion of problem fixing, as well as redefining the notion of concept, context, and content. the history of architecture is not so different from the history of science. it is a history of the forms of conceptualization, and elaborating it further would mean the beginning of a question that builds upon earlier concepts, but that does not presuppose the existence of a specific answer or solution.
the rest, is still (unwritten)
best,
a.